{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/23/2013 4:44:01 PM
3
The belief exists, what they believe in does not, so you'd be erasing the delusion.
English
-
By acknowledging the belief you accept religion as a predicate. I do not.
-
Proof?
-
Religious people make the claims deities exist, it's their job to provide proof of their existence, not the other way round.
-
No, you're the one saying they don't exist. You provide undeniable proof for that claim.
-
There's no evidence for any deity. I can't be bothered to argue beyond that, because if you're religious you have most likely been led to believe you are entirely correct, and logic will not deter you from thinking that. I've learnt my lesson with you people.
-
Lack of evidence =/= proof of nonexistence. I'm agnostic; maybe there's a God, maybe many gods, maybe no God or gods. Nobody is absolutely certain, or if they think they are they're arrogant as shit.
-
Personally, I don't believe in any sort of creator, but if we found evidence for one I'd openly admit I was wrong. I refuse to believe in any sort of God associated with any man-made religion though.
-
ITT: Atheists who don't know the difference between opinion and fact.
