{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by IVI1CR0S0F7:
4/23/2013 4:45:16 AM
76
Am I the only one here who likes 343?
Or the Waypoint forums for that matter?
While I don't use the forums often, I had no problems when I did use them. The stat tracking works and has a clean look to it. The avatars are a bit dull, though.
As for 343, I'd say Halo 4 is a pretty good game. It definitely had more cons than previously Halo games(Forge makes me sad), but it is still a fun game to play. I would also like to add that I made a Flood map and found out you can't have weapons spawn in Flood. So, other than a crappy forge and no Infection, Halo 4 is great in my eyes.
Halo: Anniversary and its graphic switch option is one of the coolest things I've seen in a remake.
I enjoyed Forward Unto Dawn.
I am sure I will enjoy Halo 5.
What did they do to upset you?
Edit: I didn't know that I could vote on my own poll and so I clicked on the 3rd option.
-
Does anyone remember when that kid asked a panel of 343 employees why they didn't do a new version of Blood Gulch in Halo 4? And he asked why they made a remake of a remake instead? The answer he got was "I can tell you from personal experience, Halo 3 did not have a Blood Gulch either". That pretty much sums up the level of intelligence I see in 343. I think it may have actually been a RoosterTeeth employee who said that, but still. What the heck did he think Valhalla was, if not a variation on Blood Gulch? Just...facepalm.
