Before you jump to any argument, allow me to lay down the terms:
It is a long, wide road with few turns and lovely straights. It's mid-afternoon and the road is rarely used by commuters, as there is a shorter, faster route to get between settlements. The speed limit on the road is the national limit (that's 60mph for those unaware). It is just you on the road, and you can see ahead of you for miles - the road is deserted. For argument's sake we'll say you're doing 100mph on this 60mph road.
With only your life in danger if anything goes wrong, is it still irresponsible? If you accept that it is your fault should anything happen to you, are you not entitled to, essentially, "go for it"?
Any thoughts?
-
Edited by A Good Troll: 5/7/2013 4:26:25 PMThe only person I'm putting in danger is myself. I carry auto insurance to cover any damage to my personal property or the physical property of others. I carry health insurance so I cover all the health expenses if I should say, hit a tree. But realistically, I never go full out on public roads anyway. I'll gladly go to VIR, the local drag strip, or some other HPDE event if I want to run all out, where I know the surfaces are prepped for full-on driving and there are medical staff on site should something happen. Anyone with a car with more horsepower than a Honda Civic ricer knows that street roads grip terrible.