JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
originally posted in:Secular Sevens
Edited by Diplomat: 5/4/2013 10:12:58 PM
11

White Man's Burden and American Foreign Policy

I've been grappling with this idea for quite some time now, which is the notion that the American foreign policy paradigm is a manifestation of white man's burden. Our country, according to this idea, believes that we have a moral obligation to prevent "lesser" nations from making mistakes. This results in a slew of military interventions (i.e. Kosovo, Libya, or Somalia) and economic assistance (i.e. USAID), because we believe that they are incapable of finding a solution themselves. I'm not entirely sure if I believe this, but what do you think? If our foreign policy really is a nationalistic offshoot of white man's burden, is it bad? I mean, we are only helping to develop stability in order to prevent the deaths of more people and open up markets for American businesses. Of course, that can easily be misconstrued as civilizing the savages, can't it? EDIT: I forgot to add in economic reasoning

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • If the plan was to open up markets for American businesses its worked to an extent - weapons suppliers and private military contractors have become very wealthy, whereas the US has to deal with rising debt due to their financing of the various 'War(s) on terror.'

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon