{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/11/2013 11:07:45 PM
1
Like I was just saying, there is something naturally wrong with it because it's an abnormality, literally by definition. You are basically trying to argue your perspective and igonoring the technicalities which do matter in this situation. And tolerance isn't the same thing as saying there's no issue with it.
There are many reasons why I want it to stay civil unions. It's not something that I put minimal thought into because I'm aware it's an unpopular opinion in the US and is restricting some rights.
English
-
Edited by Trad: 1/11/2013 11:15:31 PMThen by all means list those reasons. Secondly, (since teh puma is not about to branch this off into semantics with you, that'd take far too long,) teh puma will just argue with definitions as you see them. Flawed as they may be. An abnormality does not equate to something being wrong in nature. Especially in this case. You've yet to present anything worth noting here.
-
I don't think we're making any progress here. If I do list these reasons, I'd have to explain them in grave detail, some of which I've already expressed and seem to suffice well enough. I think I'll just end this here, because this is an issue in which neither side will come to an agreement. However I do respect your opinions and think you have the right to express them, and that should extend to me as well.
-
Edited by Trad: 1/11/2013 11:18:16 PMAs arrogant, and childish as this sounds; no, teh puma doesn't care for your opinions on this matter as far to respect them as much as others. This is a matter of basic human rights, and frankly shouldn't have to be argued on. If you want to backpedal, then fine.
