{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Astellan:
9/18/2019 3:26:41 AM
1
No, my points do not dismiss themselves. You wish they could because you can't make an intelligent counterargument. The content will go away, Bungie has already stated the ONLY things that would come back are the rewards. REWARDS ARE NOT CONTENT. Content is the events, the activities you do, rewards are just that, Rewards for doing CONTENT.
So, how stupid are you? How is it that Bungie can't make persistent content that all connect? What is their a LAW or something that says the annual passes cannot be interconnected? No? So you are just spewing BS here. The reality, you are paying 10 dollars for access to content vs paying 11.67 for content that is persistent. There is no argument you have here. An Extra $1.67 for content that will not be removed is a better value than paying 10 dollars for content that has a 3-month shelf life. Congrats for proving how stupid you are.
I bet your that idiot that would pay 13 dollars to rent a movie when you could have just bought it for 14 dollars because that is the argument you are making, dumb dumb.
English
-
Edited by Bore: 9/18/2019 3:28:28 AMPlease, tell me, how are the stories of the annual pass connected? You can’t have the story affect the world if the world can’t change. Also, they said content [u]could[/u] comeback and that weapons [u]would[/u] come back.
-
No, Luke Smith has already stated that the content WON'T COME BACK. As he said, he believes the stories mean more if they are time-limited. So, no you pay for access, now you are trying to move goalposts. how can't the stories affect the world? We replay old missions of kill Ghaul. So should we remove all that? Let's remove raids to because how can the world change if we can still do leviathan. Or how about Strikes? How can the world change if I can do Inverted Spire whenever I want? Do you actually read you stupid posts or are you just that dumb?
-
Old missions don’t spawn in the middle of the world. Vex invasions are literally going to spawn in the world. Portal opens in the sky and vex come out. Thats how the activity is initiated. You can’t have the story progress past that while still having the invasions. Not to mention the strain all the content would add up to. We have another 2-3 years of d2. Continuously adding content would slow the game down significantly. Use your brain. Don’t buy it if you you don’t want it. You’ll end up buying it any way though, seeing how simple your mind is.
-
Edited by Astellan: 9/18/2019 3:50:06 AMFirst of all, no it wouldn't slow down the game. Lol, this game has less content than most MMO's Expansions. GW2 Launch game has more content than all of D2 with every expansion and DLC. You seem to be making the argument that we will have too much to do.. lol, this is a new low in fanboyism, the argument that players should have less content to do. Man, you are a dumbass. Second, I won't be buying Shadowkeep. You can keep saying I'll buy and you will be wrong. What's going to be great is seeing you waste 40 dollars on this game, and then in two years have nothing to show for it. I will resub to WoW or just play City of Heroes, one of my favorite games, before I waste a single dollar on a Bungie game. The more people like me the more chance of seeing this game go away and seeing people like you get butthurt because we did everything you advocated for. Don't like it then don't buy it! Great Idea. Tell more people to do that. :D
-
Most mmo games are low quality graphics and run on pc exclusively. Destiny 2 takes 10+ minutes to start up on consoles. If you’re leaving the game, why are you on the forums? I guess you are just a simpleton. Can’t really expect much from you.
-
Destiny takes 10 minutes to start up on consoles because consoles use HDDs. Sucks to be you, I do not care. Also, Lol, no the graphics in Destiny 2 is old hat compared to all the new titles. You would have to be a thick-headed dimwit if you think this game has better graphics than the current crop of games. What are you going to do about me being on the forums? Whine like the sissy you are. I bet you are a real coward IRL.
-
Name an mmo with better graphics than destiny. Destiny 2 has been getting slower and slower. More content means more loading.
-
Black Desert. https://www.blackdesertonline.com
-
[quote]Black Desert. https://www.blackdesertonline.com[/quote] Not even close to destiny...
-
Edited by Astellan: 9/18/2019 4:14:53 AMLol,wrong. That game has better visuals, the models have higher polygon counts, and the graphics engine has to process more variations than Destiny will ever have. You are locked to characters wearing the same armor with different colors in destiny. Black Desert you can make the character look like however you want. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-X8bEx3mrao Even the hair is better rendered than Bungie's poor attempt. You can deny it all you want but its graphics are better and you are at this point completely beaten.
-
Edited by Bore: 9/18/2019 4:15:39 AM[quote]Lol,wrong. That game has better visuals, the models have higher polygon counts, and the graphics engine has to process more variations than Destiny will ever have. You are locked to characters wearing the same armor with different colors in destiny. Black Desert you can make the character look like however you want. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-X8bEx3mrao You can deny it all you want but its graphics are better and you are at this point completely beaten.[/quote] You high? https://youtu.be/X0k4tyJ5pI0 https://youtu.be/KTQoUxLT4cE
-
Nope, all the stuff you are showing me is lower in visuals. In fact, the lighting in Destiny 2 is awful and the visuals are blurry. What should I expect from a console player, telling me that a blurry game that is in desperate need of a sharpening filter has better visuals than Black Desert? Lol, stop eating lead.
-
Edited by Bore: 9/18/2019 5:13:47 PM[quote]Nope, all the stuff you are showing me is lower in visuals. In fact, the lighting in Destiny 2 is awful and the visuals are blurry. What should I expect from a console player, telling me that a blurry game that is in desperate need of a sharpening filter has better visuals than Black Desert? Lol, stop eating lead.[/quote] Black desert looks like shit compared to destiny. You’re a fuсking retаrded.
-
Edited by Astellan: 9/18/2019 4:29:11 AMSpoken like an idiot fanboy. Destiny 2 has the worst textures. The Lighting is awful. The game is blurry and anyone and their mom can tell that Black Desert has better graphics. At this stage, you are just reinforcing what a tard you are. D2 is a slightly better version of D1 in terms of graphics. That is it. And you are talking to a guy running this game at 1440p, 120fps, and all setting max. What are you running on? 30fps. Yeah, shut it. :D Hell, even if you hit 60fps, on the console the game looks like a choppy mess. Oh, and excuse me what resolution are you on? Oh, that is right.. 1080p. You do not know what good graphics are. I can only imagine the stuttering you endure due to the lack of variable refresh rate.
-
Aww, no argument so you are trying to move goal posts. Too funny! In debate class, that question would have been flagged as conceding the argument. How does that matter? The Stories of the Annual passes being separate or connected has no bearing in the conversation. The annual passes can be connected stories or separate.You are talking about pricing model of temp content vs persistent and then acting like Persistent content cannot be made with interconnected stories. That just shows you have zero idea what you are talking about. It's like arguing that a novel cannot be made into a graphic novel...That is a design decision of Bungie. How does making 10 dollar temp content somehow free up Bungie to make the stories interconnected? It doesn't. Thanks for asking a stupid question in some vain attempt to look smart.
-
Read better
-
Lol, you edited the comment and now are trying to act like I didn't read it. You are such an idiot.
-
[quote]Lol, you edited the comment and now are trying to act like I didn't read it. You are such an idiot.[/quote] It was edited about 10 seconds after I first sent it out. You clearly didn’t read it.
-
Of course, I didn't read that because I was responding to the unedited part, you brain dead mouthbreather. :D
