{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/19/2017 3:47:29 PM
2
Alpha player here. Granted I haven't played the beta, but from all the streams I've seen the game looks pretty good with some needed tweaks here and there.
And before anyone says that my opinion is void because I only have a mere 400 hours on destiny, I'd like to ask: why does your 1000+ hour play time give your opinion any more weight than mine? Actually, one could argue that people with large play times will give biased reviews; these people are so attached to d1 that they refuse to accept change be it good or bad.
I think it's funny that players in this community scolded bungie for making "destiny 1.5" and yet can't accept changes to the game. I welcome the new mechanics because I want to play destiny 2 (a new game) not destiny 1.5.
English
-
So why is having biased opinions about D1 and being attached to the game a bad thing? Those people are the ones that love the game the most, which is proven by their dedication to it over the years.
-
I'm not saying that being attached to the game is a bad thing. By all means, if someone enjoys the game that much then play it. But if someone is so attached to the game where he rejects other possibilities as viable, then I'd consider it a bad thing. This leads to hypocrisy. A lot of people complained about destiny 1 (including me), and in order to improve, things need to change. You can't have one without the other.
