{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/11/2017 2:45:20 AM
1
I didn't read it after you edited it. But that doesn't change the fact that hungering blade changes nothing in terms of you killing blade before he gets a kill.
English
-
lol I didn't edit anything. It's like the third or fourth response where I clearly state, '' Obviously a shotgun can't one hit kill a full health blade.'' I'm paraphrasing a bit, but that is basically what was said, with no edits. I mean, this is what I'm talking about, you have such a lack of a position that your only hope is to actually argue points that I agreed with? Wat? As for the second part of that response, I disagree, I think it will. But that is where we disagree. We done? Or do you want to argue other points I agreed with? Really this is becoming tiresome. Astonish me. Make an argument.
-
Tell me what effect hungering blade makes before the bladedancer gets a kill. I'm just dying to hear this one. And I hate to break it to you, but it clearly shows when a post has been edited.
-
Edited by Scorpius XX1: 2/11/2017 2:58:18 AMEven if it were, which I actually don't recall doing, has it occurred to you that it could have been due to a spelling error, or typo? I remember making the statement, and I remember the thoughts clearly flowing in agreement on that point. OK, I'm trying to give you something here, I agree with that point. Be gracious about it and stop looking for '' Gotcha's '' You are not going to outsmart me, ok? You want an answer based on how it works now, or how it will work after the nerf, you didn't specify. And I'm still waiting for an argument from you btw, set up questions is not a position, it just shows that you are out to prove me wrong, not prove yourself right based on the merits.
-
Lol okay. We'll go by your insane requirements. My argument is that a nerf to the way hunger blade affects health and shield Regen [b][i][u]AFTER[/u][/i][/b] a kill, will have absolutely zero effect on how much damage is required to kill a full health max armor bladedancer before they have gotten a kill. You've insinuated multiple times that it will obviously have some sort of effect. So let's hear it. How does a perk that does [u] nothing[/u] until you get a kill affect how hard you are to kill before you've gotten a kill?
-
lol, dude you are funny, I'll give you that. My insane requirements? Desiring someone to actually have a position on the other side that can be debated is insane??.....o.........k then.... I feel like I'm in an online washing machine from Hell. How many times do we have to go over this? I already conceded that point, on numerous occasions. Obviously I am talking about after the first hit, or consecutive hits a blade takes, the whole point of regening health after a kill using Hungering blade is lost if the perk favors taking more damage then it does actually regening health or shields. That's the entire point of the perk. Understand? If the damage taken supercedes the health on kill, which we clearly know it will, that defeats the entire purpose of the perk. If you nerf it, then by definition the perk is non viable. Especially in crowds where the super is supposed to shine the most. Do you understand now?
