JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
Edited by Onion Beetle Fan: 12/11/2016 1:35:37 AM
26

No, Hillary Clinton Did Not Get More Votes Than Any Candidate Ever

[url=https://mic.com/articles/161840/no-hillary-clinton-did-not-get-more-votes-than-any-candidate-ever#.7Ao5bN25d]link[/url] [quote]You've probably seen this exultant headline going viral on Facebook: "Hillary Clinton Gets More Votes Than Any Candidate Ever." Not only did Hillary Clinton crush Donald Trump in the popular vote this year, she has now also won more votes for president than any candidate in the history of American presidential elections. Incredible! For anyone brokenhearted over the election results, it's an irresistible story. The milestone is a stunning achievement for Clinton. It's also additional fodder for a [url=http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/11/15/1599912/-Hillary-Clinton-s-popular-vote-lead-breaks-1-million-and-the-lead-continues-grow-we-have-the-mandate]popular narrative among liberals[/url]: Clinton was not only America's preferred candidate — she smashed modern voting records. [b]The only problem? It's false. [/b] Hillary Clinton's tally of about [url=http://cookpolitical.com/story/10174]65.5 million votes[/url] is far short of Obama's 2008 intake of over [url=http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2008/federalelections2008.pdf]69 million votes[/url]. She's close to Obama's 2012 count of 65.9 million, according to the [url=http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2012/2012pres.pdf]Federal Election Commission[/url], but as of Friday, Clinton has decisively not gotten more votes than any candidate ever. Many people associate the fake news epidemic with ultra-conservative websites, branded with shoddy design and names like Truth Eagle Report, which vomit out [url=https://mic.com/articles/161405/terrorist-camps-in-america-obama-secret-islamic-isis-compounds-to-attack-donald-trump#.XgtJuG9BG]obvious hoaxes[/url] about Obama's allegiance to ISIS and the like. But this incident provides a bizarre look at the way more reputable websites can unwittingly participate in disseminating inaccurate news on either side of the aisle. [b]So where did the false story come from?[/b] The Yahoo piece that went viral happens to be a syndication of an International Business Times news story. On Thursday at 10 a.m., an IBT reporter covered Cook Political Report's electoral tracker showing Clinton's popular-vote count had reached 65.5 million. IBT published the article with the headline "Hillary Clinton Gets More Votes Than Any Candidate Ever," and the line, "Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has garnered at least 65,527,625 votes in the 2016 presidential election, the most any presidential candidate has ever received," with no evidence to back up the claim. The factoid fit into the narrative of Clinton's growing popular vote count and historic margin of victory while still losing the electoral college. [/quote]

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • The race wasn't for wooing California and new York it was for electoral votes. If anyone wants to whine about smaller states having "too much" sway tell me why they would have joined the union in the first place or why they would stay in the union now. California has the same 2 Senate seats montana does and nobody riots about that. If it WAS for the popular vote trump could have campaigned more in big cities and won that too. Ps. To quote every liberal ever in 2008 and 2012, "you lost. Get over it". Kek.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    25 Replies
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon