{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Ghostfire239:
5/31/2016 4:21:08 AM
72
Question about the "Wombo Combo"
Why do people think it's OP? You use a melee and a grenade to get a kill. That seems fair enough. I don't hear people complaining about Sticky grenades and they kill you in one shot without the use of a melee. It's not that hard to get out of either, unless your directly in the middle and in that case the fella who got you simply did a good job. So I'm a bit curious as to what makes people think it's OP? Perhaps it's something I'm not seeing.
[spoiler]Now before people say that I main a Hunter and that I use this "wombo combo" I just have to say that I use Nightstalker because of my dream to one-day be able to get a group of enemies tethered (while I have bloodbound) and actually get the kills NOT for some melee grenade combo. I hardly ever get lucky enough to tether a large group of enemies and when I do I end up getting killed before I land :([/spoiler]
-
Edited by Decayed_Persona: 6/1/2016 3:25:19 AMIt's not op actually, I agree that it is very effective. I do think you are spot on that at the cost of a nade and melee it's fair, but too many people think it's not even though I will give a balancing comparison. A sunsinger can loadout with full discipline,strength, longer radiance and two fusion grenades and with claws on... you have two one hit over shield melee with crazy range, two one hit grenades that you just throw in the area and they jump at you not to mention the radiance duration increase to further annihilate everyone with. How is the nightstalker wombo more OP than this combo? Imo it is not.
