{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/28/2016 4:54:54 PM
1
A board of directors is almost always ensconsed on the business side of things as they represent the stockholders, and not the consumer side. In fact, they have a fiduciary responsibility to the stockholders, and can be sued if they don't do their job. While that doesn't mean they don't care about consumers, it's not who they represent. I'd have to look up who is on their board to get a clue.
English
-
I get that. It's a question of whether the "best thing" for Bungie's shareholders is to do what is in the long term best interest of Bungie and its major games like Destiny or is to comply with the terms of the contract with Activision which gives Activision a lot of control. This is well with the business judgement rule. As a player, I would prefer that Bungie focus on the long term success of Destiny and thus its own long term success. My concern is that it is too beholden to Activision to do that and instead is more focused on what goes into Activision's next 10-Q filing. But, alas, such is capitalism and it's only a video game.
