Uhhhh I understand it perfectly, you Sanders supporters throw out Citizens United left and right. The supreme court's decision in that case is consistent with what the legal definition of a corporation is. A corporation is put into existence for the sole purpose of relieving the fiscal burdens/liabilities of shareholders (individuals), it relieves the fiscal burdens and liabilities of shareholders by assuming the burdens and liabilities that an individual would typically be subjected to. In business and tax law terms, a corporation assumes all the risks an individual would, that's how it protects shareholders. That way you can only sue the corporation and NOT the shareholders, in short a corporation assumes all the risks of an individual, Citizens United allows corporations to also enjoy some benefits of being an "individual" Throwing out the suggestion of Oligarchy is a pathetic reach on your part