{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/2/2015 8:24:08 AM
1
Really you want me to go there?
Titans had one time use supers the entire first year.
Voidwalker is a one time use super therefore not a slayer super. You can get lucky and fools group up so you can get multiple kills, same thing for Strikers.
Sunsingers aren't really a slayer super because you're using your abilities to get kills or you're using your own weapons. Just because they charge faster and might get 2 or 3 kills unless you're playing against bad players. It's no different then a Titan sitting in his bubble wasting idiots who charge in to die.
Meanwhile the entire first year Hunters could wipe teams.
GG almost guaranteed 3+ kills. Not including all the neutral game buffs they get.
Bladedancers could wipe a team and people spawn and wipe them again. Don't forget QuickDraw/blink combo.
The guardians abused the shit out of it to where Bungie nerfed Bladedancers 3 time in Year one. [b]MORE NERFS THEN ANY OTHER CLASS[/b]
Bungie has stated that when things get abused to a point expect heavy NERFS.
English
-
Edited by lIIume: 12/2/2015 8:39:19 AM*ignores all the bullshit you just wrote because you didnt read* look at what I quoted and try again. From your previous comments I can honestly tell that you know nothing about PvP. Your claim that warlocks were not the most competitive class with hunters last year shows that. [b]The text below is basically what I should've said in my first comment towards you.[/b] Sunsinger & Arcblade were by far the best two subclasses last year. Gunslinger isn't even a good subclass, it has a good super and thats it. Do not sit here and tell people that sunsinger with those burning nades, ram, and self res were not amazing in Trials AND sweats. Please refrain from acting like you know everything when you don't. Bungie doesnt nerf things based off of the forums. Otherwise, thorn and tlw wouldve been nerfed a lot quicker. It took them 6 months to fix all of the insane weapons even with data showing that both were broken. Edit: oh look, an amazing 400k medal score. Youve hardly played PvP yet you're writing essays on here like you're some veteran lmfao
-
So what if I don't have a 4.9 million medal score like you have. So what if I don't waste all my free time playing PvP. So what if I'm not as good in PvP as your stats are. I'm not that good at PvP nor will I ever claim that. I don't care enough. I play PvP for fun. I played as a Titan throughout the entire first year in crucible. I have used Hunters and Warlocks in the crucible but they aren't for me. I feel like playing a Hunter in PvP is easy mode and to boring for my tastes. I also can't stand the Warlocks jump style. Hunters were top in crucible the entirety of Year one correct? Yes they were. Thus Hunters were the most heavily nerfed out for the 3 classes. Warlocks came in second throughout the entire first year, correct? Yes they were and they got nerfed accordingly with patch 2.0. Titans were considered a unpredictable liability in the entirety of year one. If you were good with a Titan then you were fine. But the majority of the players sucked when playing a Titan. With patch 2.0 they got some NERFS and buffs to attempt to balance. I don't see why you're trying to attack me when all that I'm posting has been proven by a year with million of stats that prove it. But I guess you'll just ignore this.
