{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Synergy-Seven:
11/13/2015 2:45:53 AM
1
Well, if my objective was to waste people's time, then that's trolling. So let's select scenario B; I'm trying to humour a few people - currently 30 up + the many to counter the downvotes. my individual effort applied has already paid off in contrast to the collective based on the concept i mentioned above. Why try harder?
I'd assume we're both very strong-willed people who hold to different mantras on how we conduct ourselves in the online community. Regardless if you agree with me or not, the question is, how much time are we both wasting by having this conversation in the obscure depths of this thread? If this is the plot twist to get me back, then you have partially succeeded, as i could have spent that 10 minutes dedicated to you on wasting time/entertaining a hundred+ others. Then by this concept, in your mind you would have only succeeded in delaying the inevitable.
English
-
It was your choice to reply to my comment, you easily could have ignored. Since I put in the time to make the comment, you put in the time to reply to the comment, then we both just kept it going. I am simply trying to figure why this comment was liked by so many and I guess get a feel for the you, the person who came up with it.
-
Edited by Synergy-Seven: 11/13/2015 4:46:02 AMDo you really want to know why this got so many upvotes? This post was initially tanking until i included a portrait of Freddie Mercury (for no -blam!-ing reason at all), then by some natural phenomenon, it started to do alright. Query that and you will eventually get on my level and start wondering why a predominant target audience who love to throw the word 'Fgt' around have collectively liked this.
