JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

10/24/2015 3:36:02 PM
5
Releasing elemental primaries was a mistake in the first place. It really did hinder your weapon choice when doing NF's. Personally I like the direction of no elemental primaries. They were awesome but a mistake. They were too good.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • When HoW released, that left you with 17 elemental primaries to choose from. What part of that is a limited selection? You had a limited selection for the NFs because the weapons were the best, not because of elements.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I would have to disagree. They are the best because they have elements on them. If a garbage gun had elemental damage people with use regardless. For void burns people used atheons epilogue or word of Crota. Two guns that aren't great but because of their burns they get some playtime.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Fatebringer was the only hand cannon with firefly. Elemental burns didn't matter in raids. Enemy shields don't resist anywhere but nightfall. VoC was a scout rifle with 27 rounds, great stability, and full auto. The only other scout rifle close to it was the Fang. Everyone used Red Death at Crota because it had the best perk for the job, not for the element it didn't have. VoC and FB just had the best perks for [i]every[/i] job. People would still love FB if it wasn't arc. It's just that good.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Those weapons are good. I love them. But for a lot of people the biggest positive of a gun was the element burn. Take for example the trials adept weapons. Those weapons perks were mostly for pvp but people used it in PvE cause of the burn effectiveness. I like that they are staying away from elemental primaries because it frees up your primary to whatever you want it to be. Say it's void burn for NF, you can play with your favourite primary with your perfect roll and not have to switch over to a crappy void burn gun. You are given more freedom I think. When arc burn and solar burn was up year one if you weren't using fate, fang, or VoC or any other primary with arc or solar you were either dumb, trying to make it hard, or you just didn't have it. You most likely ran with those guns because, yes they are great guns in their class but mostly for the burn. You're telling me if fate, fang, and VoC had no burns people will use them over guns that do have burns even if they had bad perks? I really don't think so. People will always flock to the most efficient way and fastest way to get a job done. And if you had a weapon with the same burn as the NF, no matter how bad it was you went with that regardless of how good the weapon was.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Ok, but what about times where burn doesn't matter? NF was the only place it did. There was no reason to use FB or VoC over any other gun when running a raid. Or strikes. Burns didn't matter there. The shields don't even resist in the raids.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon