{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/14/2015 1:47:26 AM
2
... Uhhhh, are you basing it on a rag someone with long hair and a beard wiped their face with 2000 years ago? Or the toast people see his face on? You know who might exist 2000 years from now?... Mickey Mouse! There is no proof that he existed other than fictional stories that have been exaggerated... I have a bible from 1872 and 1995 and 2009. 1872 is different from 1995 and 2009
English
-
First of all, I hardly understood your English. Second of all, I'm basing this off from the thousands of Roman accounts which, hold as much of his teachings as a Christian bible.
-
Here's a fact! Jesus' name was not Jesus. That's just an English translation of his Hebrew name. And have you physically seen these 1000's of documents that prove his existence? Have you read the story of the Egyptian God Horus? You bible thumpers should take a look at it and see how similar it is to the New Testament
-
Oh course Jesus is just a translation, as are many other historical figures, and must you call me a bible thumper? I'm not supporting any religion, it's just a fact that Jesus Christ historically, did exist. Also if you wish to believe in the Egyptian gods that's your choice, and it has nothing to do with this conversation. Ps: I actually HAVE seen these records, I even took a few pictures whilst visiting historical Rome.
-
I'm fairly certain that HISTORICAL Jesus existed, and this is coming from someone who is nihilistic. There's just debate on whether he was the son of a higher being.
-
[quote]I'm fairly certain that HISTORICAL Jesus existed, and this is coming from someone who is nihilistic. There's just debate on whether he was the son of a higher being.[/quote] Exactly my point, whilst I have my beliefs, you can't deny his historical existence.
