But how many factors are they really taking into account? In addition to being at a good distance from the sun, good size, good rotation speed, good chemical composition, and good temperature earth has going for, there are also things like how the moon stabilizes the environment, and Jupiter deters comets and asteroids away from earth. There's probably a few hundred I can name, but you get the idea. Sure, you could say that life works the way it does because of those conditions, but the point is we don't actually have evidence of it being able to work any other way. Not that I wouldn't like the idea of a universe filled with life.
English
-
You would have to be a very narcissistic human to think that we are on the only planet that has life in something as vast as the universe.
-
I'm just saying there's a lot more factors to consider.
-
A planet capable of life doesn't mean it has life. Also, u til we find life elsewhere its really up for interpretation.
-
True, but I feel like you were exaggerating just how easy and common life should be. Maybe it's just me.
-
Edited by Britton: 10/8/2015 6:29:08 AMCatchy title. Also, I think basic life is probably rather abundant, galactically speaking, but complex and sentient definitely much much less
-
What a journalist.
-
No, I didn't take an event and spin it to fit my political agenda while slinging wild accusations and derogatory terms.
-