Question, why are we resorting to a 1v1 scenario for balancing in a [u]team[/u] game. If you lose with your super in a 1v1 to begin with, you should already start reconsidering your approach. On the larger scale, a super should be balanced around its team play. If you pop your Golden Gun and got reKt (yes, with a capital K.) by someone who was prepared for it, you telegraphed it too easily. When that happens, switch it up and use Golden Gun in the middle of a team fight with the chaos as your cover. I lose to the Sunbreaker super every time, and thats because they catch me with my pants around my ankles in the middle of nowhere, [b]alone.[/b] Do I cry nerf? No, because I messed up royally by splitting from my team. So heres a better scenario, if a team of 5 can focus fire and kill a Blade Dancer - under the pressure of watching everyone die one by one to stop it - why can't the same be done for a Sunbreaker? Since all I've seen in the Crucible is my team gawk like idiots at the oncoming storm, while I'm the only one trying to protect the team by trying to take down the threat. tl;dr The super may be powerful, but the only reason no one can beat it is because we're all playing separate games at the same time, instead of grouping up to survive.