{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/28/2015 5:57:10 PM
8
[quote]Remember a year ago when Bladedancers were OP? [/quote]
No - I remember a year ago when whiny guardians were claiming Bladedancers were OP, but never did one actually make a strong case outside of "He killed me! Bungie, nerf him!"
English
-
But aren't subclasses supposed to be OP? They're not really super if they suck
-
Hunters complained that they didn't get damage reduction, and that they can lose their super in animation where they have no control. (Hell I just shot down a Hunter in GG animation yesterday.) The reason was that they had a mobile, multiuse, ranged super - and these drawbacks balance out the benefits. Hell, I ran into a Sunbreaker while Bladedancing. I didn't even get through his shield with the first hit, and he OHK'd me in response. At the moment, I don't see how a Bladedancer can beat a Sunbreaker at all.
-
Thats the point lol Titans are supposed to be tanks.
-
In the Neutral game, yes. We're talking about supers though. Really, Sunbreakers seem to have all the benefits of the other supers (mobile, ranged, melee, area of effect, damage reduction, explosion, lingers,...), but no downside.
-
Would really like to see a response to this argument. Good job!
-
Ok kid blade dancer was insane before shotguns and thorn became rapant because of the armor buff so your point is invalid also :p
-
What armor buff? Seriously - what is this armor buff that everyone seems to go on and on about with BD's?
-
BD originally had a higher damage reduction. It was reduced.
