{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/25/2015 12:49:56 AM
5
Then why dose the cold have a limit when heat can infinity become hotter? So maybe there is no cold only lack of heat.
English
-
[quote]Then why dose the cold have a limit when heat can infinity become hotter?[/quote] Both have a limit, albeit theorethical. While 'absolute cold', zero Kelvin, would be achieved by completely stopping the Brownian motion, absolute heat is achieved by 'shortening' the wavelenght frequency to the planck distance (the shortest possible distance in the universe), which is calculated to be at around 141.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 K - luckily enough this temperature is simply called the planck temperature. While you could theoretically make more energy to make it hotter, anything beyond the planck temperature is simply beyond the concept temperature itself. It isn't a temperature anymore beyond this point and thus there is a hottest heat and coldest cold - it's just extremely unlikely that any of these extremes will ever be achieved in the history of this universe.
-
Not really, something that is cold, doesn't have as much heat as something that is warmer. The more heat something has, the faster it's molecules move. So theoretically, something could gain heat infinitely. But, think about the states of matter, solids have molecules with slower moving molecules, therefore less heat, than liquids which have less heat than gasses. Eventually, when something gains enough heat, it will become a plasma, and then it's molecules will be moving so fast, they actually break apart, then the substance doesn't really exist anymore.
-
But energy can not be destroyed or created, only transferred. I think that's how the saying goes. While I do agree religion is not the answer to what science can't explain. There must be a higher being that created the [b]initial[/b] Big Bang, not our Big Bang, something that said or thought, "Lets doing something with is nothingness."
-
You should study the quantum vacuum more thoroughly
-
I never said energy was destroyed, I only said that the substance didn't exist because it's molecules broke apart into ions, like the suns nuclear fusion makes the solar wind, and personally, I'm a Catholic
