I'm not claiming it's fiction. I'm simply saying that just because a few key places and people line up doesn't mean it isn't historical fiction. You're right, the burden of proof does lie on the one making the claim, so don't think you can prove something just because the bible says so and the bible happened to be right about something entirely different. I understand the topic perfectly. You're trying to prove your own presuppositions with non sequiturs and circular reasoning.