JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

9/18/2015 9:44:25 PM
2
You don't think there would be a similar uproar if Garmin stopped providing the satellite service to a GPS unit three months after it was purchased without warning the customer that that would happen?
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • But bungie warned everyone that all endgame content would be tied to light level not character level. It was right in front of everyones face, if you kept up on news and the live streams.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • There would be an uproar. It it doesn't mean they aren't in the right. Also, satilite privligaes are expsensives. If they go under or decide that they aren't making enough money to use them, should they be obligated to maintain a satlite connection to their units at further cost? And again, this situation is nothing like if Garmin took down the satalites because if gps lost signal than you lose all access. You still have access to all activities, just not with the same freedom.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by BK1223: 9/18/2015 10:04:54 PM
    Here's this semantics argument again. We do not have access to the same activities no matter how you word it. What if I bought HoW specifically for the high level strike playlist? Now I can't do it anymore. Yes the content is there but it's not really the same. I'm sure you'll find fault with this analogy as well, but it's like buying a sports car and the company releases new software for the on board computer as an upgrade, but I you don't buy it, they force an update that only allows your car 1/2 of the horsepower it's capable of. I am really not understanding why in the world anyone thinks what bungie did was right.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Let me just say the reason I specifically see it as right is because it helps me. If they don't spend money on the vocal minority, the game will be better for the silent majority. Everything has an oppurtunity cost and what you are asking for takes away from what I received. Yes. I am being selfish but so are you. Luckily Bungie is legally in the right so we can move forward and the game can get better. Yes people will be mad, but it is a minority of people and a minority who aren't spending any more money anyways. The game will move on without them and it will be better off that. Sometimes the biggest cost of doing something is what you are not able to do with those resources.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • look at it like this, you agreed to the ToS and EULA the day you started playing destiny. in the ToS and Eula it states that you are buying a video game, you are buying a license to access their severs. You hold no right over the game at all, and they can change, add, suspend or remove any content they see if. So basically you might not agree it is right, but you agreed to let them do it.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon