{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/16/2015 7:35:30 PM
1
You used to have access to them now you don't. Its not rocket science. See, I can do that too.
If you fail to pay extra money, you lose features.
Again, it ISN'T rocket science. The simple solution is to offer two versions of them. If you don't buy TTK, you get the old version of nightfalls at the lower level and just the old strikes. If you did, you get the new version. Doesn't seem hard to figure out to me. . .
English
-
[quote]Again, it ISN'T rocket science. The simple solution is to offer two versions of them. If you don't buy TTK, you get the old version of nightfalls at the lower level and just the old strikes. If you did, you get the new version. Doesn't seem hard to figure out to me. . .[/quote] see you just did it again. That wasn't your original statement
-
lol wtf are you even talking about? Please quote my original statement where you think that I am suggesting non TTK owners to have access to TTK content. Don't look too hard, because that statement doesn't exist.
-
[quote] OK . . . features that were previously available to non TTK owners and now aren't. Before TTK they had more features than they do now. Just because you call it features and not content doesn't change the fact that it was available now it's not.[/quote] It really wasn't that hard to find.
-
Yes, I made that statement. . . what are you suggesting it implies? Before TTK came out, non TTK owners had access to nightfalls. Now they don't. No where in that comment did I ever suggest that non TTK owners should have access to TTK content. I simply said they lost functionality.
-
Well I guess I just don't understand why you're arguing with me about this then because if you weren't implying that then there would be no reason to argue about it
-
lol I was arguing with you about it because you kept saying I was changing my original statement and you were misrepresenting my position.
