{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/12/2015 10:12:47 PM
1
You totally missed my point. I am assuming that when the previous poster said he will be able to lecture to children at the least, I don't think he was talking about giving them a lecture on how you should smoke marijuana.
How is my statement any different? I could use anything. I can lecture people on why they shouldn't crash cars without ever actually being in a car crash.
Really, it's quite simple English.
English
-
Edited by Thr0ckmorton: 9/12/2015 10:25:18 PMAgain, youre relating crashing a car to smoking weed. Simple English yet you cant even read and notice im the OP of the comment. I completely meant that without trying marijuana or alcohol it is ridiculous to lecture your kids on it, pros or cons. You are just being a tool by pointing out things that are completely morally wrong or obvious injurious and trying to compare them to my statement just to be right. Again, stupid, even for a 17 year old
-
My phone wasn't displaying the comments right and it didn't show you to be the OP. In any case, you again have misunderstood my comment. Why do I have to do something to lecture on it?
