{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/12/2015 10:03:12 PM
1
I can lecture kids just fine on the topic of murder, and I don't have to have any first hand experience. This pretty much invalidates that argument.
English
-
Edited by Thr0ckmorton: 9/12/2015 10:04:50 PMYoure comparing murder to smoking weed. Stupid, even for a 17 year old
-
You totally missed my point. I am assuming that when the previous poster said he will be able to lecture to children at the least, I don't think he was talking about giving them a lecture on how you should smoke marijuana. How is my statement any different? I could use anything. I can lecture people on why they shouldn't crash cars without ever actually being in a car crash. Really, it's quite simple English.
-
Edited by Thr0ckmorton: 9/12/2015 10:25:18 PMAgain, youre relating crashing a car to smoking weed. Simple English yet you cant even read and notice im the OP of the comment. I completely meant that without trying marijuana or alcohol it is ridiculous to lecture your kids on it, pros or cons. You are just being a tool by pointing out things that are completely morally wrong or obvious injurious and trying to compare them to my statement just to be right. Again, stupid, even for a 17 year old
-
My phone wasn't displaying the comments right and it didn't show you to be the OP. In any case, you again have misunderstood my comment. Why do I have to do something to lecture on it?
