{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/7/2015 6:03:17 PM
60
Is there really a valid reasoning for anything to exist? Think about t though. Why is there any matter anywhere.
Answer that.
English
-
Ever hear of the principle of uncertainty and Hawking radiation?
-
Nope. Please explain.
-
Hawking radiation is highly energetic particles that are expelled from the innermost parts of a singularity. They escape by accelerating faster than light by billions of times fold, as represented by the inverse square of the distance of gravitation, and ergo creates energy from nothing. It is a self-propelled object able to be so by being random information and therefore being not bound by the First Law of Thermodynamics. It creates something from nothing
-
But why do they exist? That's the question.
-
Because they're destruction. They are literal destruction. Random information that will annihilate anything that it can and often does. It has no reason except to be the antithesis of creation
-
GTFO with that Jaden Smith bullshit.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
That just means you don't have an answer. Come on you great critical thinker you, I know if you try you might figure something out.
-
I'm a doctor, not a philosopher. Piss off with that stupid shit.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
>Says they're not a philosopher >Began thread on religious philosophies >kek
-
So, if I talk about rockets, does that make me a rocket scientist? Plus, this is about fact, not philosophy.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Edited by JesusOfSuburbia: 9/8/2015 10:22:21 PMIf you talk about rockets as if you are one, then immediately when someone says that's wrong you say "I'm not a rocket scientist", it's just kinda funny. Also, religion is purely philosophical. You know this with the not-trolling side of you.
-
Autism. That's what I just read. My post deals with pure fact. Please stop wasting my time.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Lel you say pure fact but call those who disagree autistic
-
K. I'd love actually debating something with you when you're done being a dumbass for sport.
-
Chill. You're gonna make yourself cry again.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
