{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/7/2015 5:49:49 AM
1
[quote]Okay. Im overall tired of seeing posts about year one weapons. You fail to see why the year 1 weapons need to be left behind. First of all, all the old guns have an unobtainable set of perks that will just be OP compared to anything now for the sake of balance. I already have guns like my supremecy and my jolders hammer before field scout was taken out of the possible perks for machine guns, and i probably have quite a few more with impossible perk combinations. If they just changed the perks, it would defeat the purpose of keeping them. What they need to do is just ensure that from y2 forward, consider the next year so that we wont have to repeat this process every damn year. But for now, the Y1 weps need to be left behind for the sake of balance.[/quote]
Right or wrong many players believed that they were going to build a character and take it though the destiny experience as they wanted.not take a naked guardian through after being stripped every year.
This wasn't the case,although it was said before release and told/explained by deej after dark below that redundancy wouldn't be a part of destiny.
It's a simple case of trust,and deej needs to get a statement out to address year one and explain a bit more about what's to come,WHATEVER the mechanics are to be.and a little apology might help.
Then many players may be able to try destiny again.....
English
-
The plan was for this to be a growing and evolving game. I think after this, they are going to come up with a way for year 3 not to be basically a reset. I think a start would be balancing weapons more often, not once every 3 or 4 months, like maybe once or twice a month. Then isssues like this will happen far less often and there would be no reason to not allow these weapons to continue, but for now, vanilla weapons especially just breaks their balance of the game.
-
This is the whole point. There is no need to be talking about what anyone thinks..... Let us know,instead of this crap no roadmap approach to the game. It's just so bloody amateurish.
-
Edited by KIngJS922: 9/7/2015 6:18:59 AMI agree, they should take a page or two from Digital Extremes (warframe) they clearly listen to their community and they detail changes and explain very thoroughly, but i imagine activision is the reason bungie cant do that.
-
The plan was also to have Player Trade and Gambling as well. Quite clearly nothing about Destiny is written in stone or what we were lead to believe.
-
You are correct. It obviously was meant to have those things. I dont agree with all the stuff they do, i just understand some of it.
