[quote]Im not even going to begin explaining.[/quote] Oh come on, that is just WAY too easy for me to attack. I'll be nice and let it slide this time. [quote]What makes having field scout on a jolders hammer op?[/quote] I thought you weren't even going to begin explaining anything to me? XD Sorry, I had to at least make that one. [quote]Because now machine guns cant get field scout, and only have 20 to 30 in the mag, my jolders hammer holds 50, and when i get heavy ammo in pvp i get 79 rounds, i can go an entire match with my jolders hamer because all i need is 3 shots to kill someone.[/quote] 1: So your PvP gripe should impact the entire rest of the game for everyone else? In case you didn't know, having Field Scout for any weapon can often times mean the difference between life or death when you're being heavily outnumbered in PvE. But screw them so long as your PvP experience doesn't get impacted at all, am I right? That isn't at all selfish. 2: So because Machine Guns can't get Field Scout anymore (Proof? I haven't personally seen this mentioned anywhere) that supposedly makes all other old content weapons OP? 3: Your opponents must be rather horrible if you're surviving long enough each and every time you happen to get Heavy Ammo. I mean a single 1-Hit Kill Rocket from any launcher will end that spree in a heartbeat, whether or not you end up killing the other guy in the process. Iunno about that one. 4: I fail to see why having Field Scout makes your Machine Gun so crazy OP when I can ping you from outside your effective range with a sniper rifle for an instant kill with a head shot. [quote]Not to mention, the overall fact that these set of perks are not obtainable, makes it not only unfair to newer players, but breaks the balance of the game they are trying to seek.[/quote] I repeat, care to elaborate on said perks that are so OP that its just broken to have them continue forward? [quote]I knew you wouldnt agree, ive seen too many of your posts about this bullshit. You just dont get it, actually you just dont wnt to see it.[/quote] Not at all. I'm an intellectual who adheres to the Laws of Logical Deduction. If you can present a strong enough case, I have no choice but to agree with you. The problem is that you aren't. But tell me something. Riddle me this; have you considered the possibility that you might be wrong about all this and that what I'm saying is in fact correct? Before I ever say anything, I always discuss it with others and likewise subject my own opinions to detailed scrutiny. In doing so, I create a case from both opposing views. I've already judged everything from your standpoint.