{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/6/2015 11:02:22 PM
2
Too can be used to replace "also" which would have made a perfect sentence. "To" has a completely different meaning. Also the "bae" in Danish you're thinking of uses æ which makes it different than the acronym. I never defended using bae btw.
English
-
I think, regardless of our world views of grammar, we can agree that bae is just plain foolish. They should just say babe. If she/he truly were before anything else then they deserve more respect than a lazy term.
-
And this is very true.
-
Correct on both, but "to" used in the way that I used it isn't incorrect. It's typically thought of as more British than American but they are both accepted. Concerning bae, I don't speak Danish and am just stating what I have been told by others that know more than me. Even though it's spelled differently, it's said the same and that's where the problem is. I think, if it really does mean before anything else, it should be in caps and not written like it is a real word.
-
read and read are spelled/spelt the same but are different so bae and bæ aren't even the same. And don't say you don't speak Danish so you're going off what you heard then tell me you're not incorrect because you're using "to" in the British way not American way. It doesn't make to argue that I'm wrong by using the American way, the way I know if you're going to argue bæ means poop based off of what you heard. Either way you're wrong on all accounts 🙌🏼
