{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/6/2015 5:50:16 PM
1
How does that change the argument? Religion is still making the claim of something existing, so don't they need to provide the proof?
English
-
It changes the argument because it isn't biased in favour of atheism anymore. My point is you cannot say 'God doesn't exist' without proof either. 'God exists' and 'God doesn't exist' are both claims which need proof for people to believe them. Treating one side like it needs proof more than the other is idiotic.
-
Gotcha, but I disagree.
