Actually the tension started when decisions were made the blatantly decreased the quality of the game. The lawsuit was the culmination of the tension that ended with an artist being denied compensation for his work that he had earned. This compensation was due him by contract. He cared for the quality of the product, so when he spoke out the company went after him unjustly. You have a pathetically hard time grasping such a simple concept. You are blatantly bias, the evidence of which being that you are trying to focus on the wrong aspect of the article. You are rendering a simple concept ambiguous because your argument is week.