JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

originally posted in: CONFIRMED: BUNGIE SOLD ITS SOUL...
9/5/2015 4:42:15 PM
1
0
Din
Din

[quote]"While Destiny was planned for a September 2013 release, the story was substantially revised in August 2013. That pushed the release date back to March 2014. O’Donnell returned to work after a vacation, but the audio team and his supervisor did not consider him to be fully engaged in his work. The release date of the game, meanwhile, pushed back to September 2014. Bungie set in motion a process to terminate O’Donnell." Look at the trailer notice how a lot of content is missing also notice alot of it is sold as dlc later on, also notice day 1 DLC. It's not a leap it's a logical conclusion, also the story writer the guy that spend years on the lore left due to cut issues.[/quote] Thanks for proving my point! Substantially revised. That's it. Nothing about cutting anything. How do you know they didn't make it better? How do you know? You don't.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Jorgieus-: 9/5/2015 5:25:20 PM
    "How do you know they didn't make it better?" Because I saw the trailers and interviews and then played the launch game, did you not play it or something? how is the game lacking tons of content in the trailers and interviews better how is a game which was tone down for last gen better? do you even think before you argue ? "The story was substantially revised in August 2013." Clearly you do not understand corporate speak, you can tell from the guy that wrote the lore that left, to the lack of story we had, to the fact areas in the trailer became DLC that they cut things is order to sell as DLC, they cut story to cut costs etc.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • 0
    I only played beta. look. I don't know how he game changed. If it was significant. Of if had a big impact on the story. None of us do. Not you Not me You can make all the assumptions you want, but that's all. The only opinion that matters is if you like the game. Do you like it? Not, I would have liked it better if............. Do you like it. That's all that matters.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I only played beta. look. I don't know how he game changed. If it was significant. Of if had a big impact on the story. None of us do. I read the cut lore, it was extremely better and even made perfect sense with the story line, the traveller was the villian of the story etc which fits the whole anti Christ theme of the game with the fallen, the speaker etc so do not give me that "none of us do" crap. "The only opinion that matters is if you like the game. Do you like it? Not, I would have liked it better if............. Do you like it. That's all that matters." No no it doesn't clearly is why I'm arguing the point if you think that is all that matter then shut up and leave the comments don't waste my time or others that care about cut content etc go play the badly cut game, and go spend £40 for scraps of new content called TTK.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon