{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/5/2015 8:43:54 AM
1
Very true, the extent to how disruptive to me is questionable, but I feel he was justified. He saw his work being bastardized and that's never a good thing. Also i'm pretty sure the reason why Activison didn't want his music to be released, was that they wanted to save it for the games...but that being said...were they planning on firing him before hand? seriously who asks someone to do all of the work for a 10 year project at once...that just sounds shady.
English
-
Edited by XSoldat13: 9/5/2015 8:54:09 AMWell, he is justified. That much is true. However, you can't use such justifications in a business. Business does not have emotions. It only has objectives. The main one being how do we make more money? Activision is very good at following this objective. All the work at once is a bit shady. Why they chose this? I don't think we'll ever know. I think it lies a little more in Activision wanting to lock down this project. Save that sure thing. I would have preferred them working on one game at a time. That's just a philosophy I like to follow. "I am more afraid of the man who practiced one kick a thousand times than the man who practiced a thousand kicks." I probably butchered that. But it's Bruce Lee.
