[quote]Keyword: [b]Can[/b] It hasn't.[/quote] Did I not just give an example? [quote]And by that logic, we shouldn't infringe on this woman's beliefs.[/quote] Yes, but Federal Law takes precedence over religion. That part is covered by the "Separation of Church and State" clause. [i]In 1878, the Supreme Court was first called to interpret the extent of the Free Exercise Clause in Reynolds v. United States, as related to the prosecution of polygamy under federal law. The Supreme Court upheld Reynolds' conviction for bigamy, deciding that to do otherwise would provide constitutional protection for a gamut of religious beliefs, including those as extreme as human sacrifice.[/i] So, as you can see, Federal Law [b]can[/b] restrict religious beliefs.