JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

9/4/2015 2:20:33 AM
2
Difference between this and Topeka is that they didn't have a religious basis which is protected by the constitution. A Federal Law cannot overrule a Constitutional right. Correct me if I'm wrong. Now she has a right to freedom of religion. Her religion prevents her from giving those licenses to gay couples. It can be concluded that it is [b]unlawful[/b] for her to refuse those licenses [i]but it is [b]unconstitutional[/b] to punish her or force her to do it.[/i]
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • The Supreme Court ruled that gay marriage is a right protected by the 14th amendment

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Federal Law can modify Constitutional Amendments. Like how we have Freedom of Speech, yet can't yell "Fire" in a crowded theatre. Again, you can practice what you want, as long as it doesn't infringe on Federal Law or the rights of others.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • The churches shouldnt the courts should. there everyones happy its not hard.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Shiloh Ivy: 9/4/2015 2:30:02 AM
    Keyword: [b]Can[/b] It hasn't. And by that logic, we shouldn't infringe on this woman's beliefs.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Keyword: [b]Can[/b] It hasn't.[/quote] Did I not just give an example? [quote]And by that logic, we shouldn't infringe on this woman's beliefs.[/quote] Yes, but Federal Law takes precedence over religion. That part is covered by the "Separation of Church and State" clause. [i]In 1878, the Supreme Court was first called to interpret the extent of the Free Exercise Clause in Reynolds v. United States, as related to the prosecution of polygamy under federal law. The Supreme Court upheld Reynolds' conviction for bigamy, deciding that to do otherwise would provide constitutional protection for a gamut of religious beliefs, including those as extreme as human sacrifice.[/i] So, as you can see, Federal Law [b]can[/b] restrict religious beliefs.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Yes, but Federal Law takes precedence over religion. That part is covered by the "Separation of Church and State" clause. [/quote] Separation of Church and State clause means that no Law can be made with influence of Religion. [quote]So, as you can see, Federal Law [b]can[/b] restrict religious beliefs.[/quote] Can it restrict this one then?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Can it restrict this one then?[/quote] Yes. No one is being forced to hand out marriage licenses considering how you can always quit if you disagree with the law.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • But you're forcing someone to quit because of their religious beliefs?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • No, that's only their reason behind them not doing their job. Not doing their job is the basis for them getting fired.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by David The Grey: 9/4/2015 3:18:20 AM
    I'm sorry I explained the best I could, and you still don't get it. So, either you're stupid, or completely unwilling to listen and accept what I say as Fact. I'm done, I'm out, Flood help you. Flood help us all...

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I was about to agree with you, but since you wanna be a dick.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I'm sorry, who's the one that's been using a circular argument? It's abundantly clear the only reason you instigated this dialogue is because you just wanted some vindication. And please, prove me wrong.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon