{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/26/2015 10:52:37 PM
1
Most of [i]those[/i] stick to the groups.
I would say >4% of the older posters still post.
At that point, it's no longer what it used to be. The change is too substantial.
You can call it whatever you like, that doesn't make it what it used to be.
English
-
When was this ever about me saying it's what it used to be?
-
You've been saying "it's still the flood!" The entire time. The flood is [i]what it used to be.[/i] not what it currently is.
-
The Flood is the community. It changed, it isn't gone. What you said is the Flood isn't the same, which is true, it's drastically different but if there's people here, the Flood is here.
-
No, the [i]community[/i] is the community. The flood community, which is comprised of posters pre-2014, is gone. It's like saying a square is a rectangle. You can be a community member, that doesn't make you a floodian. They aren't mutually synonymous.
-
Says who?
-
Says common logic. I just explained everything supporting my claim.
-
Your explanation was things changed and now it doesn't exist.
-
My explanation was "The community is defined by it's members. The members left, so now it's different.".
-
Not all of them.
-
A good enough portion for it to change. We covered this already.
-
Who decides what portion that is?
-
Someone who has been here to see them go. More than you can say. Why do you want to fall under the moniker so badly anyways?
-
I don't care about titles, but if someone like you does go for it
-
