{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/24/2015 10:30:28 PM
1
Wouldn't there be in 3rd world countries?
Don't they protest against both terrorism and antiterrorism?
English
-
Do 3rd world countries truly have the capability to bomb over things like that, aren't they more along the lines of intimidation and police brutality? Do I agree, for the most part?
-
Edited by cleetusHD: 8/24/2015 11:28:26 PMBut isn't bombing classed as a brutality? Isn't that the point of it? Doesn't bombing intimidate people too?
-
Didn't I say intimidation as in striking fear into citizens without necessarily doing something as massive as a bombing? Didn't I think about this in the back of my mind, and only truly realize it once you mentioned it?
-
But the act of terrorism doesn't always work as intimidation does it? Isn't that the reason why these sort of people go to extreme measures when it comes to striking fear into people?
-
Are we talking about terrorism or intimidation?
-
Depends, isn't terrorism supposed to intimidate people? Doesn't that mean we're talking about both terrorism and intimidation?
-
Isn't all forms of terrorism intimidation, but not all forms of intimidation terrorism?
-
Although that is correct, isn't terrorism seen to be the most effective form of intimidation?
-
Am I disagreeing with you, so much as pointing out we were talking about intimidation, not necessarily terrorism specifically?
