{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by ChunkyBiscuit:
8/20/2015 3:06:57 PM
1
Pre production might've started first, but that does not involve developing. Pre production involves hiring the right people for the project, getting funding, getting the right equipment, and much more. It's not quite development yet. Also since Respawn was a new developing company, they had to take longer than other big developers might have had to be able to get a publisher that would want to publish their game. But Treyarch hardly had to spend any time on pre production because they were already a big company, and already had a publisher, employees, proper equipment, funding, and all that a developer needs to begin development. Titanfall might've started pre production first, but Treyarch started development first.
English
-
Titanfall started first In development BO3 started in mid-December
-
Titanfall started pre production first. BO3 started development first.
-
Titanfall started development in 2012
-
Titanfall started pre production in early 2013. That's not the development stage
-
No they didn't
-
Do you have any evidence? I've provided you with two articles stating the time that both games started development, yet you haven't given anything to support you claim.
-
I'm trying to post a link but my tablet wont let me.
-
If you'll just tell me what you googled (if you googled anything), and I'll look it up.
-
When did Titanfall start Development
-
January 2013
