{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/31/2015 2:21:04 AM
2
Ridiculous argument. I'll advocate for women's rights, racial rights and gay rights despite not being in any of those groups. It's not wrong to voice support for what's right.
English
-
Uhh... what are you talking about? Who was arguing against the rights of any of those groups? Unless you're talking about the right to not be offended on the internet, which NOBODY has, or ever will have.
-
Your white knight point exists to belittle men that support women's rights. That's stupid.
-
Why not advocate for men's rights?
-
Because he's a homophobe who disdains same-sex relations.
-
Because men aren't treated poorly because of their gender. It's like asking why I don't support straight rights or white rights. There's nothing to fight for.
-
Like Dawn said, if you fight for women's rights to not being offended on the Internet, why don't you simply fight for the right for any person to not be offended on the Internet?
-
I don't fight for women's rights not to be offended on the internet. I fight for women not to be targeted because they're women. Insult the way someone plays the game, but targeting someone because of there lack of a Y chromosome, skin pigmentation or sexuality isn't something you should have to be offended about. I don't get insulted because I'm a straight, white dude, I get insulted because I'll use blink shotgun. That should be the case for everyone.
-
Targeted? You mean targeted for insults. So you are fighting for women's right not to be insulted based on their gender. Why don't simply fight for everyone's right to be insulted based on their gender?
