{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/28/2015 9:28:27 PM
1
Is a car more mobile only because it has wheels and an internal combustion engine that is controllable by an operator? If it were void of all these utilities, would it still be more mobile than a fridge?
English
-
Isn't that what makes a car? Wasn't that basically my point, but in reverse?
-
Wasn't I trying to make a point so that I could debate this point with you?
-
Do you think that that makes a car less mobile than it is? Didn't I use the example of a car to prove that mobility isn't dependant on size and weight? What are you trying to debate?
-
Aren't I trying to show that, normally and most of the time, the larger something is, the less mobile it becomes unless it is powered by some outside force that causes the object to move against the forces acting upon?
-
Edited by Dwayne the Jock Ronson: 7/30/2015 1:09:01 AMWasn't I trying to cause an unneeded point because you said you admitted it was more mobile when you said it was smaller?
-
An unweeded point, waaat? Isn't my whole point that smaller things are often more mobile?
-
Wasn't my point that they aren't always? Wasn't I just unnecessarily making an argument?
-
Didn't I agree that you are right, but that there must be outside forcing acting upon that object to make it so?
-
Doesn't the force that propels the car come from inside?
-
Doesn't the force that propels the car come from inside?
-
Isn't "outside force" a broad term to describe a force acting on an object that is not due to the object itself?
-
Was I deliberately being overly literal?
-
Would you rather me be overly literal as well, and take this conversation to absurd circumstances?
