{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/28/2015 7:21:01 PM
1
Do you need to understand me as well as I do, or just well enough to understand?
English
-
Doesn't that seem redundant, understand something well enough to understand?
-
Is it redundant, or does it only seem to be?
-
How can something seem redundant but not me, for a circumstance like this where it is?
-
But wasn't I talking about understanding [b]me[/b] well enough to understand what I had said?
-
How well do you think I understand you?
-
Is that for me to know?
-
You know how you think I understand you, and you refuse to enlighten me of your suspicions so that I could either confirm or deny it?
-
How is understanding measured?
-
Do we really need to answer that, given our superior intelligence?
-
Don't people in the U.S.A use different measurements that most people think overly complicated? Do you also measure understanding differently?
-
Does this go back to your deal about conversations having a set meaning? Does that mean you are agreeing that words DO have different meanings?
-
Or am I saying that different words can mean the same thing?
-
Does this mean sifting and observing may mean the same thing? Do I agree with you, while you also stipulate that I was, as well, correct?
-
But wouldn't the context have to be different for sifting and observing to correctly pertain to the same action?
-
Why would it need to be a different context? Does the context we used it in not fit both equally as synonyms?
