{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by ZDragonLord X:
7/22/2015 12:57:15 AM
1
Neither good nor bad. As I said, I rarely ever use it, and my points are made based off what I see and the very few times I do use it. If you read, you would have seen that I mentioned such.
I also said "I do not see a huge need for a rework." Again showing my position on it.
I try not to take a side on something I don't use or rarely use. I just stay neutral and call it as I see it based on experiences.
Edit: the OP's essay is longer, albeit better worded. Don't see you nitpicking on him...
English
-
OP: Don't like blink jump? Practice learning to counter it. Yours: Nerf blink jump OP = awesome sauce points Yours = no points for nerfing AND yes, adjusting, modifying, changing all mean NERF mmmmk
-
I never said it [b]should[/b] be, I said this is where it [b][i][u]COULD[/u][/i][/b] be fixed. Idk what world you live in, but those words mean nothing close to the same thing. The only use of "should" was where I said "there is not much they should do..."
-
Doesn't need to be "fixed" bro, it's countered easy with practice. So could, or would, or whatever does not sit well with me. Every class has strong traits and you can't tune one without tuning them all. Like I said before, you can make a case about a ton of different abilities, doesn't mean we should.
