{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by gundam538:
7/17/2015 11:34:27 AM
1
The sad thing is its most likely true. If the elitists where bad before doing this will only make it worse so it's surprising bungie didn't realize that. But we should expect them to only make such mistakes and bad decisions.
English
-
Edited by Brokkr: 7/17/2015 11:38:18 AMDid you not read what I typed? You do not know this. You are over reacting. You are insulting bungie for no good reason. You have no proof of any of this. You do not even know how much damage reduction Gjallarhorn is receiving.
-
Edited by gundam538: 7/17/2015 11:45:18 AMI didn't say anything about the nerf itself just the reaction of the players in the community. You should read more closely. I don't really care that much that the gally got nerfed and in all honesty it probably needed a damage reduction anyway it was too OP. Saying it's just a hypothesis is not necessarily true as what was mentioned is most likely more fact.
-
OK? You still saying something will happen based on nothing but a hunch.
-
Think of it this way if it was bad enough that so many complained about being nit allowed in a raid party because of not having gally how does nerfing that weapon fix or improve that problem? It doesnt. If those few felt it was needed then they will feel it is absolutely necessary now. Understand?
-
-_- it's not a hard concept to understand. But you don't know that's going to happen, and you have no previous examples to give any legitimacy to that claim. That's the problem.
