JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Service Alert
Destiny 2 will be temporarily offline tomorrow for scheduled maintenance. Please stay tuned to @BungieHelp for updates.

Destiny

Discuss all things Destiny.
Edited by Zargon: 7/17/2015 11:14:20 AM
212

Won't the Gjally nerf backfire?

Now with Gjally's wolfpack rounds getting nerfed and its effectivity reduced. I've thought about something: won't most people want even more people with a gjally after the nerf? Before, few people would accept others without it because they already had enough firepower to deal with the objective. After the nerf have been applied, I believe the it will only promote even more elitism amongst the already toxicated player base. Everytime I visit the LFG forums a lot of the post contain a "must have gjally" requirement. By nerfing the wolfpack rounds, people will feel the need to only accept gjallys to accumulate for the nerf introduced, thus resulting a backfire to this nerf's original intent. To eliminate exclusivity. Any thoughts? Edit 1: To admit, I've never owned a Gjally before and I've played since day one. I have already had much trouble trying to get into a raid or PoE team. Edit 2: Better formulated the op.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Edited by R8 Revolver Only: 7/17/2015 10:24:46 AM
    ... I'm speechless that this can even be thought of... Gally deals around 8.9k damage lets say the nerf drops it down to 6k damage it still is the hardest hitting rocket launcher and a beast but, think about it from a smart stand point other weapons will be used because there is a less power gap in power. Every other exotic now has a higher chance of usage because of this I can use the patience and time for bosses sense the gally is less effective while the PoT has invis and perks that could prove to be more useful than gally's straight up damage. An example could be WOULD you rather have something that deals 100 damage but stuns the enemy for a time period or something that deals 200 damage? I would rather go with the stun because from a tactical stand point it is far more useful than increased damage. So tell me again how in the hell was this bs elitist theory made up again -.-? Because it seems stupid.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    2 Replies
    1 2
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon