If you have a point to make in that reply you didn't make it.
[spoiler]there is no need to create an unneeded wall of text. You can easily say "I agree/disagree with you, with the exception of _____ and here's why" your format you use to reply is unnecessary, convoluted, is terrible at getting your point across and unnecessarily nitpicky.[/spoiler]
English
-
It's the Internet version of the gish gallop.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/14/2015 6:14:46 PMAs I said, you have horrible inferring skills.[spoiler]Would you rather I made every little point about your statement that I disagree with kept within their own individual reply? I can go on indefinitely on almost any topic. That's why I have chosen to quote what you just stated and reply to that statement in one reply since you favor to change the topic in almost every response or in what you call a rebuttal. [/spoiler]
-
I just refuse to assume your point for you when you can easily just state it directly, instead of beating around the bush.
-
My point was made in black-and-white responses two replies ago, showing you my disagreements and agreements.
-
Well then were done here. I made my point.
-
Giving up? And I thought you were the sort of person who thought with the mentality that "perseverance prevails," evidently not. Your sort of persona exhibits this bias mentality not only in history but also in your current character.[spoiler]*atheist is speechless*[/spoiler]
-
Edited by Britton: 6/11/2015 9:24:03 PMNah, youre just not worth my time right now.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/13/2015 5:20:08 PM[quote]Nah, youre just not worth my time right now.[/quote]Says the person who keeps responding. Oh...and you're*