-
You provide no answers, because you're not addressing a question.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/10/2015 5:46:17 AM[quote]You provide no answers, because you're not addressing a question.[/quote]Wow, quite hypocritical. You stated this after you stated, "[i]But my thread is the answer to your threads idiocy[/i]." I'm guessing we're in the same boat if your under the impression that there's a question that you can't seem to be resolved about in your own thread. =P
-
Right, your spreading ignorance, I'm answering it with information. I used answer twice but in different contexts. English must not be your first language.
-
[quote]I used answer twice but in different contexts. English must not be your first language.[/quote]Obviously horrible detective skills are obviously horrible.
-
So you just are really bad at speaking and understanding English? Fair enough.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/10/2015 6:12:52 AM*Britton's inferring skills grow worse while he tries to hammer me about English when he can't do it with Science*
-
Keep deflecting. Its all your good at.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/10/2015 6:24:59 AM[quote]Keep deflecting. [b]Its[/b] all [b]your[/b] good at.[/quote]How the heck do people still get [i]your[/i] and [i]you're[/i] and the contractions [i]it's[/i] and [i]its[/i] screwed up then Britton, the Englishman.[spoiler]I have nothing against the English. They're awesome.[/spoiler]Since we're now talking about English instead of Science, I think that it is safe to assume that English must be your only language.
-
Yep it sure is. And that was simply a laziness typo. Keep deflecting.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/10/2015 6:34:02 AM*ahem* You managed to change the topic from Science to English. You call what I'm doing deflecting? Hypocritical much?
-
Edited by Britton: 6/10/2015 6:40:53 AMI merely insulted your intellect. You're making a big deal about it. You could've easily just said "no, but I am multilingual, so my understanding gets skewed occasionally." But you're going on some long unnecessary tangent.
-
[quote]Right, your spreading ignorance; I'm answering it with information.[/quote]Hmm...Britton calling paragraphs of information ignorance. Now I've seen everything.
-
There's no information in the paragraphs.
-
[quote]There's no information in the paragraphs.[/quote]I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or if you're acting dumb on purpose.
-
Nope dead serious. Literally nothing, not a single thing, about your OP is based in reality, isn't misinformation or misrepresentation, or is informative. Literally nothing.
-
Wow. It looks like you have lost an interest in Christian related science. Correct?
-
No such thing as Christian related science. You cannot do science from an unsubstantiated assumption.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/10/2015 3:44:22 PM[quote]You cannot do science from an unsubstantiated assumption.[/quote]Yet the atheist believes the Big Bang happened. Yippee for reading.
-
False assumption is false.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/10/2015 3:44:55 PM[quote]False assumption is false.[/quote]Haha. Britton says I'm false without a reason. It's no wonder he was only able to develop four words for an attempt to be intimidating. *slow clap* Also:[spoiler]You don't believe in the Big Bang?[/spoiler]
-
You never asked my opinion on the matter of the big bang. You simply assumed incorrectly. Do you really think your terrible attempts at attacking my character will somehow invalidate any of the information I've shared in this forum? Because it won't.
-
You don't believe in the Big Bang?
-
Science doesn't require belief. I simoky observe discoveries as they occur, and adjust my world view accordingly.
-
Okay...? Do you consider the Big Bang to be under evidential truth?
-
No. I consider it to be something we are constantly learning more about.