{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/7/2015 1:34:39 AM
2
Allow me to dumb it down for you.
Point 1 is that you are not special enough to be any sort of authority on what constitutes entertainment for individuals.
Point 2 is that as with all entertainment that you pay to watch; television, films, sports etc. It's worth what somebody is willing to pay to watch it, no more, no less.
Point 3 is that you're too young, naive and bad at grammar to be attempting to patronise people, whether online or otherwise.
Is that a bit easier for you to understand, sweetheart?
English
-
Clearly butt hurt. Grammer doesn't mean shit. Its a cheap shot for nerds whom are not quick witted or lack sense of humor to produce a valid comeback in an online forum. Fyi.
-
Edited by DE4LZ: 6/7/2015 2:07:18 AMYeah, kinda. Point one is redundant as im not attempting to be. Point two is false as it's what the licence holder believes its worth and point three is untrue because I did and I still am, petal.
-
[quote]they're all entertainers[/quote] [quote]No they're not. Athletes are athletes. Actors memorise whole scripts and plug movies on world wide promos and musicians write perform and tour. Streamers sit and play a game someone made. Your too young and nieve.[/quote] Choke on your own hypocrisy moron. I think we're done here, not only are you wrong, you're a dick about it.
-
Don't know what you're on about? Your replys are boring too. Each and every time.
