{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Der Sheff:
6/6/2015 8:46:45 AM
2
The more I think about it, the more I agree: the 25-32% are the people the actually play crucible. While I don't think the Thorn needs nerfed in and of itself, the DoT needs to stop when the user dies. That's it. Problem solved. The range is irritating, but totally manageable. The two headshot factor is also manageable. Three body shots is fine. DoT after you drop the guy using the gun? That's aggravating.
English
-
What's up Der Sheff :) It's aggravating because of the campy nature of it. It's no different than dying to a sniper. Yeah it is annoying and you curse them hiding, but all's fair in war. Also, let me ask you this in all seriousness. If Thorn didn't have the burn, would you (or anyone else) ever use it? I think the answer is no, because the burn is the only thing keeping it from being complete trash. That's why I have no issue with it.
-
I am not saying that's he burn needs to be taken away. I am saying it needs to stop when the user dies. Basically, 2/5 of each encounters will results in me killing the Thorn user and then I die to DoT. That is the issue that most people have a problem with. Dying to DoT and not killing the the shooter, well, that's the risk we take.
