{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/1/2015 4:59:54 PM
1
My word it's like talking to a wall...
The hammer falling in the animation doesn't negate the simple fact that a below the axis barreled weapon will fire with a hammer that reaches the top of the weapon...
If you knew anything about firearms you would know that the highest point of the hammer isn't always the point used to strike the firing pin and thus fire the round.
You have zero proof to discredit this & I have over half of the hammer fired weapons in history to back up mine..
So while you keep saying the same thing, you look more and more uneducated...
[spoiler]go talk about thorn... Or fusion rifles... Or better yet a gun that regenerates ammo, not prints ammo, actually regenerates fire rounds... Smh dumbass[/spoiler]
English
-
Pretty much everything you just said is wrong, but I'm going to give you a chance to actually provide an example of your claims before explaining why.
-
Baha hah ha ha... What a deuchbag... Go look at half the firearms in history As you clearly don't understand how hammer fired weapons were ever designed (via your animation comment over and over showing you have no idea how gun internals truly work), I'll laugh at you trying to play smart. [spoiler]muted[/spoiler]
-
Edited by JustOnePepsi: 6/1/2015 5:41:23 PMYou not providing an example to prove your assertions means you're incorrect. You have no idea what you're talking about. I suggest YOU go look at "half the firearms throughout history" and realize that there are none that have a functional hammer that fires the weapon and is not aligned with the cartridge. Also, announcing when you mute someone (if you actually did, which I doubt), makes you look like a schmuck. Now please... reply to this and prove my correct.
