-
-
How can you know that if you he hasn't specified what changes have occurred?
-
That's the point; it's hypothetical. We can't use fiction as something exemplary when we only possess the fictional tale.
-
So your point is that you can give a definite answer even though you don't have enough detail to understand the question? The correct answer is simply "I don't know".
-
The question was simple. He wanted a black-and-white answer. So, of course, "Yes." He called humans in the beginning, and they should still be.
-
Should? The point is, you jumped to a conclusion without sufficient evidence, which is something you seem to do a lot.